The human touch
Bubble — By Willy Nilly on June 23, 2010 2:00 pmIT WOULD be too cheeky by half to describe humanism as a Church, but Lorraine Barrett’s decision to leave politics to become a humanist celebrant has the whiff of a higher calling. Yet it does not seem born of despair or a sign of discontent with Welsh politics. In fact, Lorraine clearly enjoys the political life and cheerfully accepts the vocation’s absurdities.
Lorraine’s atheism has none of the absolutism of a Richard Dawkins. In the cathedral of unbelief she is an Anglican not a Catholic. One feels that if Miss Marple had been a humanist she would have been a bit like Lorraine – cuddly but astute. Towards believers – such as her long term ally Alun Michael – she shows benign tolerance and respect. This gentle approach to ultimate matters adds force to her own convictions and no doubt attracts the occasional convert. Already she has a reputation for conducting funerals with great tenderness. And during her political life she has displayed much warmth and tenderness too.
Back in 1999 many a misogynist in the Labour Party and beyond muttered darkly that Lorraine’s selection for the plum seat of Cardiff South and Penarth demonstrated the absurdity of “wimmin-only” shortlists. Other detractors poked fun at Lorraine’s failure to get onto Labour’s candidates list initially. While her career was never destined to be as meteoric as the other Cardiff Assembly Members, she has proved a diligent and often colourful AM who can draw on a hinterland that extends back to the Rock and Roll years of the 1960’s. Her husband is a concert producer she met in those salad days. While Lorraine cannot be caricatured as an ageing hippy, a vivacity for life’s rich pageant is rarely absent.
In the chamber Lorraine’s speaking style is punchy and her contributions frequent. While her politics is more partisan than her humanism, she avoids a strident approach on most occasions. Although a Rhondda girl originally, Lorraine is closely identified with Penarth, her home for many years. She has effectively championed local causes such as the need to renovate that wonderful architectural oddity, the Pavilion on Penarth Pier. Here she has been astute in bringing together all shades of political opinion amongst local AMs and Councillors.
Lorraine’s humanism leads her to promote the rights of all mammals, notably badgers and foxes. A vegetarian – and teetotaller – she has reached out to the many carnivores in the Assembly to further animal welfare. Indeed, so synonymous has she been with this agenda that she has seemed to be the model interest group champion in the Assembly. As one of the Assembly’s Commissioners – a sort of supporters club for the Presiding Officer – she has championed the RSPCA’s freedom food campaign. This toleration and pragmatism wins friends and in recent years it has noticeably changed her style. Lorraine was prone to goading the rural lobby but now she is happy to work with farmers and others.
The Assembly needs good, dependable backbenchers like Lorraine to introduce a range of causes that would not always occur to the government. For example, she single- handedly brought about a tightening of regulations on tail docking during the last Assembly – the only backbench AM ever to have led the successful amendment of secondary legislation. On the Commission she has also been a consistent champion of public access and the full utilisation of the Assembly estate. As the “local member” for the Assembly, her sense of pride in the building is unmatched, and she wants the people of Wales to see it and use it.
No rebel, Lorraine has broadly accepted the role of government supporter and is rarely to be found in the awkward squad. She is a product of Labour’s former dominance in South Wales and can appear a little uncomfortable in the more competitive culture that has characterised devolution. However, her innate cheerfulness and tolerance has helped her adjust better than most of her colleagues.
Lorraine leaves front line politics at a time when Labour needs another dollop of modernisation. It is a time for young Turks rather than faithful servants. But Lorraine’s faithful service in devolution’s formative years will surely be remembered with affection.
Tags: Assembly, Lorraine Barrett







Tweet This
Share on Facebook
Digg This
Bookmark
Stumble
7 Comments
Remembered with affection by whom?
This is painfully naval gazing. Please stop now!
Not stopping anything. There’s plenty of other content on the site if you don’t like this sort of article
There’s plenty of people who will remember Lorraine with affection, both within and without the Labour Party – and the Assembly itself.
I find comments like those made by Tom really sad, that we cannot say anything good because they are a member of another party.
Civilty has died, God dammit.
There is a anecdote that I have heard from Chris Matthews about Ronald Reagan and Tip O’Neill.
That after going after each other Tip would go up to the White house for a drink and shoot the breeze as well as get something positive done for the people.
No wonder we are in the mess we are.
While this series still needs to convince me, as someone who has stood against Lorraine, I have to say she is a good woman and I for one will miss her from the Assembly.
Well said Daran.
Lorraine will be missed, and I’m sure will do the power of good for the humanist cause in South Wales.
I recently attended a funeral officiated by Lorraine and it was a lovely ‘service’ (if that’s the right word for a humanist funeral), full of warmth, humour and remembrance.
Daran said
“There’s plenty of people who will remember Lorraine with affection, both within and without the Labour Party – and the Assembly itself.”
Reads like an obituary Dar!
“The Assembly needs good, dependable backbenchers like Lorraine”. Does it?
The problem with having a National Assembly of only 60 Members is that almost every Member must be a Minister, Junior Minister, Opposition Spokesperson, Whip, Committee Chair, Presding Officer, Deputy Presiding Officer, etc. This leaves little room for dependable backbench members. This is in no way meant to detract from Lorraine Barrett’s work and I am sure she is of equal or greater ability than many MPs in Wales. The difference is that many MPs in Wales do not and will not hold positions of authority in their parties or Westminster and can therefore concentrate on being dependable backbenchers. If the National Assembly had 100 Members or more then I would agree that “the Assembly needs good, dependable backbenchers like Lorraine”.