Thoughts on four parties in Wales
Westminster '10 — By Daran Hill on May 7, 2010 9:07 amSOMEONE described what we’ve just witnessed as 40 Welsh by-elections on the same night, and to an extent they have a point. But beyond that there are actual trends that can de discerned – even if you have to look a lot harder to find them than usual. But I’ll have a damn good try even in my totally sleep deprived state.
It would, of course, be a lot easier to do this in Scotland where not a single seat changed hands apart from Labour retaking Glasgow East from the SNP, which had been lost to them in a by-election. I may move up north after the last 24 hours. Life seems so much simpler there.
LABOUR
Well y jiw jiw, as my grandmother would once say. Nobody – but nobody – predicted that. Labour sources were clear it wouldn’t be as bad as was being suggested but to hold on to 26 seats was a minor miracle. Even more amazingly, Labour did it in Wales on 36% of the vote – a full 1.5% down on the calamity of the 1983 election result.
One of the major things that saved Labour was the inability of the Conservatives to take medium range targets in Wales. Thus the party held urban targets like Newport West and Bridgend with more comfort than had been speculated. There was a swing against Labour, but the party machine was in much better fettle than it had been for several years. In the local elections of 2008 and the Euro election of 2009 Labour’s collapse was sharper in Wales than in other parts of the UK. That was not true in 2010 – Welsh Labour did leagues better than its English counterpart.
Why did this happen? I’d suggest three factors played a role. One was Peter Hain. His persistent message of saving Wales from the Tories may have grated with the other parties, but it obviously worked with the electors from Delyn to Swansea West to Ynys Mon. He repeated the mantra as a constant and his message was simple and, quite simply, plausible to the electorate. Look no further than than the 10,000+ majority for Nick Smith MP in Blaenau Gwent to prove this point.
Secondly, Labour’s has begun to overhaul its operation and deploy its resources – and by damn they are more scarce than in the past – to best effect. Yesterday it found the form that in 2001 allowed it to lose 200,000 votes across Wales but shed no seats.
Thirdly, Labour is the luckiest party in Wales. End of.
CONSERVATIVES
The Tories can draw particular comfort that they were the party to gain the most in Wales last night. They entered with three seats and finished with eight, which is a clear step forward, especially when compared to the dysfunctional Scottish Conservative Party which once more returned just one MP. The Welsh Tories have remade themselves and it’s delivering for them, albeit at a slower rate than they would hope.
Thus they got back to around 25% of the vote in Wales last night, the share the used to take before the long nightmare of 1997 began. This was a clear uplift and brought with it gains like Carmarthen West and Pembrokeshire South, the Vale of Glamorgan, Aberconwy, and Cardiff North (just). They have seats in most parts of Wales again, though eastern Clwyd remained stubbornly loyal to its “new” Labour leanings in targets like the Vale of Clwyd and Delyn.
It was a credible performance, though not a sparkling one. But at least, as Cameron considers his next move, the Welsh Conservatives can reflect that they helped put him in that position – in stark contrast to their Scottish cousins.
Oh, and Glyn Davies won Montgomeryshire too on what seems to be, at about 13%, the biggest swing to the Conservatives in any part of the UK. If I had had a bacon sandwich in my hand when I heard that whisper I would definitely have dropped it. Stunning, simply stunning. But hardly symptomatic of a national trend, as I’m sure Glyn would agree.
LIBERAL DEMOCRATS
Well, that didn’t quite go as planned did it? At the start of this campaign pundits wondered whether the Lib Dems would emerge from it with one seat or six. It was all up in the air. Then came Cleggmania and the attendant hysteria and it seemed they were on course for serious progress.
But yet as they gaze into their bleak porridge this morning, they must surely wonder what on earth went wrong. How can a party take a 219 majority in Ceredigion and make it rock solid 8000 plus; but in the neighbouring seat of Montgomeryshire, once their safest in Wales, see their mandate crumble. Local factors must surely be the answer, because one size does not fit all.
And that is a lesson they have learnt in their urban centres too. Swansea West was so within their grasp, yet they faltered and fell. Badly. It felt like watching an Assembly election all over again as every Lib Dem hope of gain was dashed in Wales. Quite why needs serious contemplation and cannot easily be brushed away. Because if they can perform miracle swings in both Pontypridd and Merthyr Tydfil & Rhymney, what the hell went wrong in their top targets? And don’t get me started on Wrexham, which was being talked up but in which they only managed to scrape a second.
The bounce bounced away and, in Wales like the rest of the UK, the Liberal Democrats saw no positive effect of the Prime Ministerial debates.
PLAID CYMRU
In contrast, Plaid certainly saw an effect from the TV debates and in retrospect they were right to moan because it certainly impacted on their vote. For Plaid, last night was bleak. I’ve previously contended that Plaid just can’t do well in UK General Elections, pointing toward previous losses. But last night was their worst one yet.
Losing Ynys Mon in 2001 was compounded last night by polling 2500 fewer votes than they managed last time. By any explanation, that is a massacre. Similarly, you decide what was worse: losing Ceredigion by 219 votes when they weren’t expecting it; or by 6,000+ when they were really, really trying to win it back.
And set that in the context of a hung parliament where Plaid, as in the 1970s, could really demonstrate their relevance in a Westminster system and the results seem even darker. (Out of kindness I won’t dwell on the fourth place they polled in their target seat of Aberconwy, which they hold in the Assembly.)
But there were some redeeming features. Plaid may not have won Llanelli but it came damn close to achieving the double figure swing necessary to do so, which was quite something. Lembit Opik may have promised “I’ll be back” but I’ve got a feeling that it’s Myfannwy Davies who will be.
Plaid also did well in the swings it achieved in Neath, Rhondda and, most spectacularly, Cynon Valley. But ultimately these Westminster seats are less important than demonstrating momentum for the next Assembly election. An election that means more to Plaid than any Westminster contest. Watch those spaces.
Tags: 2010 General Election, Plaid Cymru, Welsh Conservatives, Welsh Labour, Welsh Liberal Democrats







Tweet This
Share on Facebook
Digg This
Bookmark
Stumble
11 Comments
Hi Daran
One of the surprises of the election, which no one in the Welsh Media seems to have picked up on, is Anthony Ridge-Newman’s 11.4% swing to the Conservative Party in Ynys Mon.
11.4%!?
Plaid’s share of the vote plummeted by 4.9%, and the centre-right maverick Peter Rogers increased his share of the vote by 6.5% to 2,225.
Prediction: Ieuan Wyn Jones will lose his seat in the 2011 Assembly election.
In Cardiff Central there was in fact a swing away from the Liberal Democrats to Labour of 1.4%.
Small, but just what we expected (though too small for us to win through).
And the reason?
Since 1997, in General Elections at least, the LD vote has been capped by anti-Labour voters (I’d say 1-3k) each time, and in an election such as this, when the Tories are once again on the surge nationally, these anti-Labour voters are seeing the Tories as a viable alternative and turning towards them.
@Daran
” I’ve previously contended that Plaid just can’t do well in UK General Elections”
Hardly a point that needs to be contended.
@Michael Jones
“Prediction: Ieuan Wyn Jones will lose his seat in the 2011 Assembly election.”
I wouldn’t bet any money on such an outcome. One thing that is absolutely clear as far as the constintuencies in the Bro Gymraeg are concerned is that Assembly and Westminster elections take place on two entirely different planets.
A lot of those seats vote for the personality, not the party. With Ynys Mon that surely goes without saying.
Illtyd said: “A lot of those seats vote for the personality, not the party. With Ynys Mon that surely goes without saying.”
It certainly has a major impact, but how does that explain the sizeable drop in the Plaid vote? It was the same Labour personality being fielded as in 2005.
Simon wrote: “I wouldn’t bet any money on such an outcome. One thing that is absolutely clear as far as the constintuencies in the Bro Gymraeg are concerned is that Assembly and Westminster elections take place on two entirely different planets.”
Agreed. And using very different turnout figures.
I agree with Simon Dyda about the Westminster and Assembly elections being two completely different situations, and so there is a risk in trying to make analogies for the purpose of predicting voter intentions for the 2011 election.
While the Assembly election turnouts have been notably lower than those for the general election, there is a possibility for a higher turnout in 2011 due to the publicity given to the referendum on primary powers.
As to the Ynys Mon result, Labour won because Albert Owen has successfully reached out to voters across the political spectrum, and so you are right to say that in this constitiuency the personal vote carries more weight than party colour.
I would also add that Albert led effectively on the campaign to secure Wylfa B as part of the energy island concept and this will potentially be of huge economic significance for Anglesey and the surrounding region. This was also recognised by the electorate.
Add to this the incoherent Plaid approach where their candidate said he supported Wylfa B but the party is anti-nuclear energy. The party is also against military bases in Wales which includes RAF Valley, a location which will expand with further training and job opportunities going forward.
So it’s clear they cannot show leadership on key issues for the island and more broadly offer a credible economic development policy.
As to next year’s result, it is a difficult one to predict. Ieuan Wyn Jones has been able to thrive electorally because many Labour and Conservative voters on Anglesey who turn out for Westminster elections have up until now sat out the Assembly election.
“It certainly has a major impact, but how does that explain the sizeable drop in the Plaid vote? It was the same Labour personality being fielded as in 2005.”
That voters didn’t like the personality running for Plaid, unfortunately.
“Agreed. And using very different turnout figures.”
Just imagine if, as a result of this hung parliament, we see the Assembly elections being held on the same day as a Westminster election. I think there is a real danger in such a situation that we could see a serious reduction in Plaid’s number of seats in Cardiff Bay.
Very good analysis of Plaid’s challenging campaign over on ClickonWales by the ever readable John Dixon: http://www.clickonwales.org/2010/05/competing-in-a-presidential-style-campaign/
This article, like many recently, highlights beyond a shodow of a doubt just how out of step with the real welsh public the demographic of commentators here are.
Once again every comment (on an article about the FOUR parties of Wales) is about Plaid Cymru and it would seem that well over 50% of the commentators are Plaid supporters. Lol! How is this possible when we just witnessed them poll a pitiful 11%. Are all Plaid supporters locked in basements with nothing but a laptop and an internet connection?? I really dont think I’ve ever come across something as detached from the real situation amongst the streets of Wales as the Welsh politico blogosphere.
Henry- you don’t get it, sorry. The blogosphere in no way claims to mirror “the streets of Wales”, rather it is politicised individuals with internet connections discussing the politics of those streets. For those internet users politics is probably the main thing many of them talk about online. For ordinary people politics is less permanent. I’m not sure online activists are any more out of touch than ordinary people who don’t know the name of their local MP or AM are.