Immigration and entrepreneurialism

Wales Business — By Russell Lawson on November 16, 2009 6:00 am
Austin, Texas is a model of economic advancement through managed migration

Austin, Texas is a model of economic advancement through managed migration

THE WORD ‘immigration’ in the UK has recently become a political ‘hot potato’, but – managed correctly – immigration could well be the key to Wales’s future prosperity.

Increased immigration is not a solution if it simply delays the problems of an ageing population. But the Welsh Assembly Government needs to set a population goal.

Although Wales has historically experienced net emigration in the past, inward migration is nothing new. For example, it is already true that the Welsh economy and society would be almost unworkable without the contribution from first and second generation immigrants now working in the NHS, in education, in construction, and in restaurants and retail. While Wales would no doubt wish to emulate Ireland by attracting back past emigrants, this is a longer-term objective, best achieved by creating a stronger economy.

In the shorter term there are alternatives. For example, we might provide incentives for non-UK citizens to stay in Wales. This could be achieved through attracting economic migrants or through attempting to retain overseas students rather than forcing them to return to their home countries. This seems the most feasible way of not just reversing the depopulation trend, but also in attracting entrepreneurial talent to Wales. The desire to succeed is surely strongest in those who are prepared to break with their own families, friends and country of upbringing in order to prosper.

There are a number of good reasons to encourage economic immigration: Wales’s population is both declining and ageing, and the natural growth rate shows no sign of compensating for this; company start-up rates are much higher for people of ethnic backgrounds than for any other group; and U.S.-based evidence also points to a much higher rate of academic entrepreneurs amongst overseas students who stay on after graduation.

The difficulty may be in attracting the economic immigrants most desired, since other countries have similar problems. While some media outlets still like to dwell on the potential disadvantages of immigration, many governments of developed economies have quietly accepted the need for greater immigration in order to keep the economic wheels turning. Even low-skilled immigrants are equally crucial in keeping the economy growing through filling vacancies in areas like personal care, construction and retail.

Whether citizens of other countries want to permanently settle in Wales to live and work, or to do so on a temporary basis before returning to their homeland, their participation in and contribution to Wales’s economic and social improvement should be welcomed. As well as the direct economic benefits from migration, there is another important reason to encourage greater diversity in Wales: the impact on the Welsh economy and society of having a more open, tolerant society.

The work of academics like Richard Florida suggests that such an ‘open society’ is likely to encourage greater diversity of economic activity and act as a magnet to attract entrepreneurs, both at home and from afar. This need not be as difficult as it may at first appear. Cardiff and Swansea are popular student cities with thriving arts sectors, as well as excellent natural attractions nearby.

This is a good basis from which to cultivate the Austin, Texas phenomenon: the bringing together of technology, talent and tolerance to allow a relative backwater to compete with the likes of Silicon Valley. Austin has been found to be more affordable and offers improved lifestyle, as well as job prospects.

The challenge for Wales’s cities is to offer the same in competing with the superior job prospects of the south of England. However, in order to build on its natural advantages, Wales has to reinforce its reputation in other areas: in terms of being a welcoming country to foreign nationals; in terms of being tolerant to minorities; in terms of encouraging cultural and economic diversity. This may involve greater support for crucial elements like universities and cultural activities, as well as strengthening of minority cultures and areas. It is also important that Wales promotes itself more effectively, with a greater degree of co-ordination and using a generic brand to cover promotion of diverse activities, from the arts to inward investment.

If we can build on Wales’s natural advantages by widening our cultural and economic appeal, we can also begin to attract more people to the country and help overcome the negative demographic changes currently built into our population. However, there is likely to be increasing international competition in this area, and so attracting more outsiders and retaining our own potential migrants will only be achievable by such ideas being positively embraced.

Tags: , ,

2 Comments

  1. Coolydoodyjudy says:

    Rare indeed – a thoughtful piece about immigration that highlights the advantages, and challenges the xenophobes. The flow of migrants from Ireland aided Britain’s economy a few decades ago. The fact that Ireland educated it’s emigrants then cared for them in old age, and Britain received the benefits of their periods of economic activity, not least the tax take, benefitted the host at the expense of the home country.

    The “Celtic Tiger” phase of Ireland’s economic history managed to build inward migration, mainly from Eastern Europe, with positive economic benefits. This was far from popular and some people who had themselves migrated for work, did not welcome the newcomers.

    Every economy throughout its history has drawn strength from migration of skills and ideas, even if the cause of the migration was deplorable. The sad thing is that migration and migrants are villified too readily when perhaps they should be welcomed and lauded.

  2. Financier says:

    Russell,

    An interesting academic thesis, which tends to ignore the experience fron England on unplanned and uncontrolled immigration. The reason for the rise of the BNP in many English towns, is that the residents have seen the rise of unrequested culture change (it is culture not race that causes the problems) and a political agenda that has told them that it is good for them. Thus they see, correctly or not, that immigrants receive preferential treatment regarding housing, education and benefits. It is culture that enabled the people from Eastern Europe to integrate better than those from Islamic countries. This meant that there were no calls to imtroduce their own laws or beliefs on the resident population.

    Whilst you point out that some races (e..g Indians) are natural business people, it should not be forgotten that Wales with its population of about 3 million people already has political sectors that are fearful of the dilution of Welsh culture by immigrants from England, let alone elsewhere.

    Also Wales has a high percentage of its population of working age who are either unemployed or on incapacity benefits and I do not see these people included in your proposals.

    The Welsh economy is in a state of deterioration and this has been recognised by IWJ in his shift to bring in R&D centres for multinational companies. However, this is a long term operation and does Wales have the infrastructure and skill sets that these conmpanies require?

    Wales does have uncompetitive communications both physical and electronic. It does need to relieve the North & South bottlenecks and develop the centre – which would mean expanding the housing stocks available, if immigrants are to have somewhere to live.

    Wales did have a good international brand, the WDA, but WAG in their wisdom abolished it. Most companies that may wish to set up in Wales would be serving a UK, if not European and international market and thus will wish to have communications (from any part of Wales) that will enable them to reach those markets quickly and efficiently – the infrastructure changes required will be costly.

    Wales is down to three major indutrial sites: Airbus at Broughton, Refineries and LNG at Milford Haven and CORUS at Port Talbot. The loss of any one of these would have a major impact on the Welsh economy -yet all belong to multinational companies who will switch operational sites to suit both client demand and their profitability. Wales, at present, is cetainly a high cost and highly regulated country, in which to operate a business compared with countries in Eastern Europe, Africa and Asia – how ill your proposed immigrant entrepreneurs fare – or will they be attracted to cheaper and less restrictive countries in which to operate?

Leave a Comment