A question of timing
Labour leadership race — By Daran Hill on October 30, 2009 6:00 pmEVERYONE has suddenly got an opinion on when a referendum on increasing the Assembly’s powers should be held, and it’s still about three weeks before the All Wales Convention reports.
Yesterday it was Peter Hain who set the agenda when he made a hard hitting speech at Cardiff University and argued that the climate was not yet right to hold a referendum that could be won. It proved to be a hot topic both within the lecture theatre and in the political sphere.
Indeed, it migrated easily too, to last night’s Sharp End on ITV, where a debate was held between the leadership contenders. Earlier today on Betsan’s blog resident squatter Adrian Masters reflected on the discussion. He says: “For those watching for any hints of how the next First Minister might view chances of a referendum I thought there was an interesting difference of opinion. Huw Lewis put very strongly his ‘one poll at a time’ argument that Labour needs to concentrate on fighting the next General Election before any referendum. Carwyn Jones warned that it would be “a bad move” if Labour AMs pushed ahead without the support of Labour MPs. Only Edwina Hart seemed to regard the One Wales pledge committing Labour to campaigning for a successful Yes vote as the priority that Labour’s partners in Plaid see it. Small differences? Maybe. But important both to those who’ll select the new leader and those in Plaid who’ll have to work with them.”
And Plaid have certainly started having their say. By a beautiful coincidence, Rhodri Glyn Thomas AM weighed in this morning on WalesHome.org. He was quite clear that: “The new First Minister of Wales should lead the campaign for further powers for the Assembly in the forthcoming referendum” and, by implication, that should be a priority for whoever wins the leadership election.
Helen Mary Jones AM, Plaid Cymru’s director of elections, took it further in this morning’s Western Mail when she said: “This isn’t a matter for internal party politics. People like Huw Lewis need to remember that the deal was supported by the overwhelming majority of his party rank and file as it was by mine… The timing of the referendum should depend on the Convention’s advice and when the referendum is most likely to be won and not on an election to another place.”
This evening Huw Lewis will bite back. Speaking to Labour Party members in Preseli Pembrokeshire he will say: “Either Helen Mary Jones is deliberately misreading what I’ve said or she doesn’t understand the terms of the One Wales deal – either way her remarks smack of political naivety. If she likes, I’m more than happy to go door to door with her in Llanelli and see what people in that community want to get on with first – beating back a resurgent Tory threat, or holding a debate on more powers.”
Responding to Helen’s Mary line which says: “People like Huw Lewis need to remember that the deal was supported by the overwhelming majority of his party rank and file…” Huw will have more to say: “I would be interested to know what Helen Mary means by that phrase ‘people like Huw Lewis’. Does she mean people like me who experienced first-hand the devastation wrought on Welsh communities by a Conservative government? People like me, from the Valleys? People like me who have actually read the terms of the One Wales deal? Or does she mean people like me who refuse to pander to certain agendas for the sake of a few votes?”
But he saves the hardest remarks till last: “Look, I was the Assistant General Secretary at Welsh Labour running our 1997 ‘yes’ vote campaign. I well remember the other parties flocking to Labour HQ to pick up campaign materials – frankly the yes campaign would have been dead in the water if it wasn’t for the expertise and hard work of dozens of Labour activists and the resources poured into Wales from all around the UK. If Helen Mary thinks you can run that kind of operation alongside the brutal campaign we have ahead of us against the Tories in the Spring she is living in cloud cuckoo land. That, or David Cameron has found an unlikely and unwitting ally in Llanelli.”
So the gloves are off between parties as well as just within Labour.
For a far less inflammatory take on the timing of the referendum, yours truly is on BBC Radio Wales “Called to Order” at 6.32pm. You can listen in here or later here.
Tags: All Wales Convention, Carwyn Jones, devolution, Edwina Hart, Huw Lewis, Labour leadership race, Peter Hain, referendum






Tweet This
Share on Facebook
Digg This
Bookmark
Stumble
4 Comments
The odds are that there will not be a referendum before 2011, particularly if Labour loses the UK election next year. In the aftermath of any defeat, Labour in the UK including Wales will be more interested in electing a new Leader and probably debating the causes of the defeat than campaigning for a referendum in the autumn of 2010 as suggested by some leading Plaid figures.
We will then be in the run up to the 2011 assembly elections when Labour will be trying to ensure that there is no repeat of the 2010 UK election result on an even lower poll. At least two of the leadership candidates will probably be more interested in the getting out the Labour core vote in their constituencies than constitutional change, if the recent opinion polls for UK marginals are proved to be correct in 2010.
No referendum before 2011 isn’t a problem for the majority of Labour activists. It is of course a real problem for Plaid Cymru. What does the Plaid leadership do if Labour does not keep its side of the One Wales bargain to hold a referendum before 2011?
“No referendum before 2011 isn’t a problem for the majority of Labour activists. It is of course a real problem for Plaid Cymru. What does the Plaid leadership do if Labour does not keep its side of the One Wales bargain to hold a referendum before 2011?”
This certainly is a particular fault-line between the two parties. Plaid will go ape if there aren’t significant steps taken to move things along.
Some additional variable I’d throw into the mix would be:
- The attitude of the Conservative Party and if they find themselves in government whether they respond negatively to this whole issue.
- The content of the All Wales Convention report. The stronger it is, the greater the push will be for a referendum before 2011.
- What would Plaid settle for short of a full referendum before 2011? Would passing the trigger votes in the Assembly and Westminster be enough?
- What if the Convention report says a lukewarm yes to moving forward but Labour is still preoccupied, quite naturally, with its leadership election and doesn’t want to react immediately? Would hardliners in Plaid or even pro-devolutionists in the Liberal Democrats or Conservatives cause mischief by tabling a motion for a trigger vote in the Assembly, thus putting pressure on Plaid and Labour’s relationship?
What is clearly very interesting about this, is that Plaid AMs obviously know exactly what they Convention will report. That is why they are talking about a pre-election referendum already.
David, it could be they know that the response will be lukewarm, and are therefore upping the pressure to make sure Labour can’t back track on the commitment in any way.
With over a dozen people on the Convention – including party political representatives – I’d be amazed if the content wasn’t being leaked for strategic purposes. The Western Mail certainly thinks it knows what the report says