<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A load of hot air?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waleshome.org/2009/10/a-load-of-hot-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waleshome.org/2009/10/a-load-of-hot-air/</link>
	<description>Independent analysis from and about Wales</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dubba</title>
		<link>http://waleshome.org/2009/10/a-load-of-hot-air/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Dubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waleshome.org/?p=2300#comment-620</guid>
		<description>Public confidence can definitely be lost in scientific knowledge. My point is that science should not be the loudest voice in this context.

I cannot abstain from my personal responsibility to myself. Neither can we, as a global community, abstain from our responsibility, our duty of care if you will, towards our stewardship of this small blue rock we can home.

Look, if someone throws a punch at me, I make a common sense judgement call ...and duck. I do not stand there like a numpty and wait for a group of arguing &#039;ologists to debate mass, momentum and velocity, before giving me their majority verdict that that ducking might likely result in short-to-medium term benefits.

Certain things are common sense. Certain things are just plain right and should not need to wait upon a concensus of impact advice from others. 

Believing I should duck is one. 

Believing that we should reconsider digging, sifting, pumping and burning the irreplaceable inner core of our planet is another.

So by all means let science have a say in this debate if you like. But for goodness sake, let it be from the back benches, and not the dispatch box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Public confidence can definitely be lost in scientific knowledge. My point is that science should not be the loudest voice in this context.</p>
<p>I cannot abstain from my personal responsibility to myself. Neither can we, as a global community, abstain from our responsibility, our duty of care if you will, towards our stewardship of this small blue rock we can home.</p>
<p>Look, if someone throws a punch at me, I make a common sense judgement call &#8230;and duck. I do not stand there like a numpty and wait for a group of arguing &#8216;ologists to debate mass, momentum and velocity, before giving me their majority verdict that that ducking might likely result in short-to-medium term benefits.</p>
<p>Certain things are common sense. Certain things are just plain right and should not need to wait upon a concensus of impact advice from others. </p>
<p>Believing I should duck is one. </p>
<p>Believing that we should reconsider digging, sifting, pumping and burning the irreplaceable inner core of our planet is another.</p>
<p>So by all means let science have a say in this debate if you like. But for goodness sake, let it be from the back benches, and not the dispatch box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klem</title>
		<link>http://waleshome.org/2009/10/a-load-of-hot-air/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Klem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waleshome.org/?p=2300#comment-619</guid>
		<description>I think science has taken an huge hit in the credibility department due to climate change research. The studies have been so bad. When they release a study which does not support thier opinion, they go back and &quot;recalibrate&quot; their equipment and repeat the study. If I got a nickel for every time they had go back and recalibrate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think science has taken an huge hit in the credibility department due to climate change research. The studies have been so bad. When they release a study which does not support thier opinion, they go back and &#8220;recalibrate&#8221; their equipment and repeat the study. If I got a nickel for every time they had go back and recalibrate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://waleshome.org/2009/10/a-load-of-hot-air/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waleshome.org/?p=2300#comment-617</guid>
		<description>Dubba - they are words of wisdom, thank you.

The recent Channel 4 sun-spot documentary caused several worthy folk to argue that the other side of the argument should not even be presented on a mainstream UK TV channel.

If the baldies-with-clipboard are wrong (and their own most recent IPCC report discusses a 90% chance that they are correct) then science will suffer a huge credibilty problem.

The MMR vaccine debacle does not bear close comparision with climate change. But it&#039;s easy to see how public confidence can be lost in scientific knowledge.

David Jones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dubba &#8211; they are words of wisdom, thank you.</p>
<p>The recent Channel 4 sun-spot documentary caused several worthy folk to argue that the other side of the argument should not even be presented on a mainstream UK TV channel.</p>
<p>If the baldies-with-clipboard are wrong (and their own most recent IPCC report discusses a 90% chance that they are correct) then science will suffer a huge credibilty problem.</p>
<p>The MMR vaccine debacle does not bear close comparision with climate change. But it&#8217;s easy to see how public confidence can be lost in scientific knowledge.</p>
<p>David Jones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dubba</title>
		<link>http://waleshome.org/2009/10/a-load-of-hot-air/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Dubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waleshome.org/?p=2300#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Climate shift is one thing. Man-made climate shift is another and the arguments continue to reign free. But surely the concept of digging, sifting and pumping stuff out of our planet, burning it, and refilling the holes with rubbish seems a little... short-sighted?

I mean, what ever happened to the common sense we were born with? We should not need to wait for 100 concensus from the bald men with clipboards and white coats to get this right; in the same way as I do not need to believe in the Big Guy, or eternal damnation, to make me pick up six eggs and the Argus for my elderly neighbour. 

I just do, because it is the nice, right, and common sense thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate shift is one thing. Man-made climate shift is another and the arguments continue to reign free. But surely the concept of digging, sifting and pumping stuff out of our planet, burning it, and refilling the holes with rubbish seems a little&#8230; short-sighted?</p>
<p>I mean, what ever happened to the common sense we were born with? We should not need to wait for 100 concensus from the bald men with clipboards and white coats to get this right; in the same way as I do not need to believe in the Big Guy, or eternal damnation, to make me pick up six eggs and the Argus for my elderly neighbour. </p>
<p>I just do, because it is the nice, right, and common sense thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention A load of hot air? &#124; WalesHome.org -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://waleshome.org/2009/10/a-load-of-hot-air/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention A load of hot air? &#124; WalesHome.org -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 05:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waleshome.org/?p=2300#comment-608</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Duncan Higgitt. Duncan Higgitt said: RT @WalesHome: Time to challenge climate change claims? http://bit.ly/9eMRa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Duncan Higgitt. Duncan Higgitt said: RT @WalesHome: Time to challenge climate change claims? <a href="http://bit.ly/9eMRa" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9eMRa</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

