<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One size doesn&#8217;t fit all</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waleshome.org/2009/08/one-size-doesnt-fit-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waleshome.org/2009/08/one-size-doesnt-fit-all/</link>
	<description>Independent analysis from and about Wales</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Jones</title>
		<link>http://waleshome.org/2009/08/one-size-doesnt-fit-all/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waleshome.org/?p=1074#comment-317</guid>
		<description>As I said, the article argues that NDR should be based on turnover, and then it argues that there should be a more generous level or relief than there is now.  Does he want a NDR based on turnover, or just a more generous relief?

I don&#039;t think iT is wise to argue for both of them as the reason there is a relief is to ensure that micro businesses are not overly burdened by NDR as it isn&#039;t currently based on T.O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said, the article argues that NDR should be based on turnover, and then it argues that there should be a more generous level or relief than there is now.  Does he want a NDR based on turnover, or just a more generous relief?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think iT is wise to argue for both of them as the reason there is a relief is to ensure that micro businesses are not overly burdened by NDR as it isn&#8217;t currently based on T.O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Higgitt</title>
		<link>http://waleshome.org/2009/08/one-size-doesnt-fit-all/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Higgitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waleshome.org/?p=1074#comment-211</guid>
		<description>In what way do you find the article confused? Or is it simply that you disagree with the proposal contained within it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what way do you find the article confused? Or is it simply that you disagree with the proposal contained within it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Jones</title>
		<link>http://waleshome.org/2009/08/one-size-doesnt-fit-all/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waleshome.org/?p=1074#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Are you arguing that we should have NDR tax banding, or a % based on turnover as an ability to pay?

This seems a confused article with no real thinking or development behind it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you arguing that we should have NDR tax banding, or a % based on turnover as an ability to pay?</p>
<p>This seems a confused article with no real thinking or development behind it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This week Matt&#8217;s assistant has mostly been reading&#8230;. &#8211; Freedom Central</title>
		<link>http://waleshome.org/2009/08/one-size-doesnt-fit-all/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>This week Matt&#8217;s assistant has mostly been reading&#8230;. &#8211; Freedom Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waleshome.org/?p=1074#comment-133</guid>
		<description>[...] featuring guest contributors from all aspects of the Cardiff Bay clique, the FSB post discussing the inherent unfairness in business rates. This is something with which I wholeheartedly agree. Like council tax, business rates are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] featuring guest contributors from all aspects of the Cardiff Bay clique, the FSB post discussing the inherent unfairness in business rates. This is something with which I wholeheartedly agree. Like council tax, business rates are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

